Manifestations and Contestations of Borders and Boundaries in Everyday Understandings of Integration

Authors

  • Carolin Fischer University of Bern, Institute of Social Anthropology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33182/ml.v17i4.836

Keywords:

borders, boundaries, practice of everyday life, integration

Abstract

This article asks how borders and boundaries manifest themselves in understandings of integration. Drawing on qualitative interviews with migrant descendants living in Zürich, Switzerland, it investigates how understandings of integration are experienced, interpreted, appropriated and modified, in relation to either the self or others. I employ de Certeau’s theory of the practice of everyday life to establish how borders and boundaries are reflected in individual meaning-making, perceptions of self and other and the ways in which people situate themselves in society. I demonstrate not only that the interplay between borders and boundaries informs specific aspects of migration governance such as integration policies, but also that people employ tactics based on enunciations of integration to act upon the social position they are allocated as a result of ascribed, racialised markers of difference.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Carolin Fischer, University of Bern, Institute of Social Anthropology

University of Bern, Institute of Social Anthropology, Lerchenweg 363012 Bern Switzerland

References

Amelina, A. (2017). Transnationalizing inequalities in Europe : sociocultural boundaries, assemblages and regimes of intersection, Routledge research in transnationalism, First published 2017., New York, Routledge.

Anderson, B. (2019). ‘New directions in migration studies: towards methodological de-nationalism’, Comparative Migration Studies, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 36 [Online]. DOI: 10.1186/s40878-019-0140-8.

Anderson, B. R. (1983). Imagined communities: reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism, London, Verso.

Anthias, F. (2014) ‘Beyond Integration: Intersectional Issues of Social Solidarity and Social Hierarchy’, in Anthias, F. and Pajnik, M. (eds), Contesting Integration, Engendering Migration: Theory and Practice, Migration, Diasporas and Citizenship Series, London, Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 13–36 [Online]. DOI: 10.1057/9781137294005_2 (Accessed 14 August 2019).

Bakewell, O. (2008). ‘Research Beyond the Categories: The Importance of Policy Irrelevant Research into Forced Migration’, Journal of Refugee Studies, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 432–453 [Online]. DOI: 10.1093/jrs/fen042.

Bauder, H. (2017). Migration, borders, freedom, Routledge studies in human geography, London, New York, Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Bivand Erdal, M. B. (2013). ‘Migrant Transnationalism and Multi-Layered Integration: Norwegian-Pakistani Migrants’ Own Reflections’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 983–999 [Online]. DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2013.765665.

Bukow, W.-D., Nikodem, C., Schulze, E. and Yildiz, E. (eds.) (2007). Was heisst hier Parallelgesellschaft? Zum Umgang mit Differenzen, Interkulturelle Studien Leske Budrich, 1. Aufl., Wiesbaden, VS, Verl. für Sozialwiss.

Casas-Cortes, M., Cobarrubias, S., Genova, N. D., Garelli, G., Grappi, G., Heller, C., Hess, S., Kasparek, B., Mezzadra, S., Neilson, B., Peano, I., Pezzani, L., Pickles, J., Rahola, F., Riedner, L., Scheel, S. and Tazzioli, M. (2015). ‘New Keywords: Migration and Borders’, Cultural Studies, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 55–87 [Online]. DOI: 10.1080/09502386.2014.891630.

de Certeau, M. (1988). The practice of everyday life, Berkeley, University of California Press.

Dahinden, J. (2016). ‘A plea for the “de-migranticization’’ of research on migration and integration”’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, vol. 39, no. 13, pp. 2207–2225 [Online]. DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2015.1124129.

Dahinden, J., Duemmler, K. and Moret, J. (2014). ‘Disentangling Religious, Ethnic and Gendered Contents in Boundary Work: How Young Adults Create the Figure of “The Oppressed Muslim Woman”’, Journal of Intercultural Studies, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 329–348 [Online]. DOI: 10.1080/07256868.2014.913013.

Durkheim, E. (2006). On Suicide (trans. R. Buss), Sennett, R. (ed), Translation edition., London, Penguin Classics.

Fassin, D. (2005). ‘Compassion and Repression: The Moral Economy of Immigration Policies in France’, Cultural Anthropology, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 362–387.

Fassin, D. (2011). ‘Policing Borders, Producing Boundaries. The Governmentality of Immigration in Dark Times’, Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 213–226 [Online]. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-081309-145847.

Fassin, D. (2020). Deepening divides : how territorial borders and social boundaries delineate our world, Anthropology, culture and society. Pluto Press, London.

Favell, A. (2019). ‘Integration: twelve propositions after Schinkel’, Comparative Migration Studies, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 21 [Online]. DOI: 10.1186/s40878-019-0125-7.

Grillo, R. D. (2003). ‘Cultural Essentialism and Cultural Anxiety’:, Anthropological Theory, vol. 3, no. 2 [Online]. DOI: 10.1177/1463499603003002002 (Accessed 11 February 2020).

Hadj Abdou, L. (2019). ‘Immigrant integration: the governance of ethno-cultural differences’, Comparative Migration Studies, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 15 [Online]. DOI: 10.1186/s40878-019-0124-8.

van Houtum, H. and van Naerssen, T. (2002). ‘Bordering, Ordering and Othering’, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 125–136 [Online]. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9663.00189.

Kearney, M. (1991). ‘Borders and Boundaries of State and Self at the End of Empire’, Journal of Historical Sociology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 52–74 [Online]. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6443.1991.tb00116.x.

Korteweg, A. C. (2017). ‘The failures of “immigrant integration”: The gendered racialised production of non-belonging’, Migration Studies, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 428–444 [Online]. DOI: 10.1093/migration/mnx025.

Lamont, M. and Molnár, V. (2002). ‘The study of boundaries in the social sciences’, Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 28, pp. 167–195 [Online]. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107.

Matejskova, T. (2013). ‘“But One Needs to Work!”: Neoliberal Citizenship, Work-Based Immigrant Integration, and Post-Socialist Subjectivities in Berlin-Marzahn’, Antipode, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 984–1004 [Online]. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2012.01050.x.

Meissner, F. and Heil, T. (2020). ‘Deromanticising integration: On the importance of convivial disintegration’, Migration Studies, vol. Online first [Online]. DOI: 10.1093/migration/mnz056 (Accessed 20 February 2020).

Penninx, R. and Garcés-Mascareñas, B. (2016). ‘The Concept of Integration as an Analytical Tool and as a Policy Concept’, in Garcés-Mascareñas, B. and Penninx, R. (eds), Integration Processes and Policies in Europe: Contexts, Levels and Actors, IMISCOE Research Series, Cham, Springer International Publishing, pp. 11–29 [Online]. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-21674-4_2 (Accessed 17 May 2019).

Rytter, M. (2019). ‘Writing Against Integration: Danish Imaginaries of Culture, Race and Belonging’, Ethnos, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 678–697 [Online]. DOI: 10.1080/00141844.2018.1458745.

Schinkel, W. (2018). ‘Against “immigrant integration”: for an end to neocolonial knowledge production’, Comparative Migration Studies, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 31 [Online]. DOI: 10.1186/s40878-018-0095-1.

Taylor, C. (2004). Modern social imaginaries, Public planet books, Durham, Duke University Press.

Thornberg, R. and Charmaz, K. (2014). ‘Grounded Theory and Theoretical Coding’, in The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, 55 City Road, SAGE Publications, Inc., pp. 153–169 [Online]. DOI: 10.4135/9781446282243 (Accessed 21 February 2020).

Wimmer, A. (2008). ‘The making and unmaking of ethnic boundaries: A multilevel process theory’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 113, no. 4, pp. 970–1022 [Online]. DOI: 10.1086/522803.

Yuval-Davis, N. (2013). A Situated Intersectional Everyday Approach to the Study of Bordering, EU Borderscapes Working Papers.

Published

2020-07-30

How to Cite

Fischer, C. (2020). Manifestations and Contestations of Borders and Boundaries in Everyday Understandings of Integration. Migration Letters, 17(4), 531–540. https://doi.org/10.33182/ml.v17i4.836