Islam, Catholicism, and Religion-State Separation: An Essential or Historical Difference?

Authors

  • Ahmet T. Kuru San Diego State University, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33182/ijor.v1i1.982

Keywords:

Islam, Catholicism, separation, state, essentialism

Abstract

There exist severe restrictions over religious dissent in most Muslim-majority countries. This problem is associated with the alliance between religious and political authorities in these cases. I argue that the alliance between Islamic scholars (the ulema) and the state authorities was historically constructed, instead of being a characteristic of Islam. Hence, the essentialist idea that Islam inherently rejects religion-state separation, whereas Christianity endorses it, is misleading. Instead, this article shows that the ulema-state alliance in the Muslim world was constructed after the mid-eleventh century, as well as revealing that the church-state separation in Western Europe was also historically institutionalized during that period. Using comparative-historical methods, the article explains the political and socioeconomic backgrounds of these epochal transformations. It particularly focuses on the relations between religious, political, intellectual, and economic classes.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2020-11-22

How to Cite

Kuru, A. T. (2020). Islam, Catholicism, and Religion-State Separation: An Essential or Historical Difference?. International Journal of Religion: Politics, Sociology, Culture, 1(1), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.33182/ijor.v1i1.982